Cover

SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

How I’m building evidence-led SA capability.

Why I’m moving into SA

I’m developing into Solution Architecture because it aligns with what I’ve already been doing informally for years: taking messy cross-functional problems and turning them into clear systems, trade-offs, and delivery paths that hold up under scrutiny.

My engineering leadership background gives me strength in delivery, governance, and operating in constrained environments. I’m building SA depth through hands-on demonstrators and structured learning - and I’m documenting it all so the evidence is visible.

How I’m building capability (evidence-first)

Case studies (evidence)

I’m building four case studies as progressive architecture demonstrators, each chosen to develop specific SA muscles (identity, cost control, data, operations, scalability):

TacSA (core architecture demonstrator)

TacSA (Technical Analytics for Complex System Architectures) is my main SA demonstrator: a tactical simulation and analytics concept designed to explore cloud-native architecture, cost control, security boundaries, and scalable workloads.

Key design themes

Portfolio platform (this site) as an architecture exercise

This website is also a system I designed and built as a controlled publishing workflow: gated admin access, environment separation (dev/prod), and approval-based deployment via pull requests. The goal was to build a real platform with constraints - and use it as evidence of practical architecture thinking.

Supporting work

I also build smaller tools that reinforce guardrails and reliability - for example a lightweight VS Code extension (“tacsa-branch-sentinel”) that reduces the risk of working on the wrong Git branch via status-bar tinting and workspace-aware handling.

What’s next

Next: Case Studies (the evidence), or Working Style (how I operate day-to-day).